(Belated) Q1 Goals and Priorities

Overview

Hi all. In this post I’ll outline some of the Foundation’s goals in terms of DAO related governance activities for this quarter. Sorry this is coming halfway through Q1. As you’ll see with our first goal, we’ll work on improving on that by next quarter.

The things we want to accomplish will be broken down into:

  • Operational goals
  • Ecosystem Growth goals
  • Global Community goals
  • Governance Iteration goals

While the operational goals are overarching priorities for the Foundation governance team, the other three areas (Ecosystem Growth, Global Community, and Governance Iteration) all map back to the priorities set forth in the Co-Creation Cycle 1 hosted in late 2024 upon the DAO’s inception.

Motivations

This is not necessarily a full list of every single thing we want to accomplish. Moreso, these quarterly updates are meant to serve a few specific functions:

  • Increase transparency.
  • Improve the dialogue between the Foundation and DAO on the specific tasks to be done, and how that fits into the overall strategy
  • Create another way to help us improve and refine the focus going forward

Let’s get into it.

Operational Goals

Have at least 1 proposal go live in the first three months of the year (so at least 3 in Q1)

We want to make sure we start getting a certain baseline of activity as the year begins. The initial intention was that we would have at least one proposal up in Jan, one in Feb, and one in Mar. Given that we’re releasing this post in Feb, we know that we have already not fully met this goal as Jan did have one proposal while Feb did not have any proposals go to formal vote.

Metric: Did at least one proposal go up in each month?

Hire and onboard a gov facilitator

The governance team is in the final stages of hiring a governance facilitator. This person will help us accomplish more in terms of increased delegate and overall DAO collaboration, improve communication, and generally help make sure the various efforts we undertake succeed. We hope they will be hired and onboarded soon.

Metric: Was a governance facilitator hired and onboarded (or at least started onboarding based on timing)?

Post the Q2 goals before the end of the first week of Q2

We will look to get these goal docs out earlier going forward, ideally by the first week of the new quarter. So shooting for the first week of April, if not the last week of March, for an overview of the Q2 plans.

Metric: Have the Q2 goals been posted by Sun Apr 6?

Create an initial media content plan for Scroll governance

In addition to the work of establishing and improving governance practices in the Scroll ecosystem, we also want to spend some of our time producing content and supporting more public conversation about governance research, practice, and innovation.

Metrics:

  • Does the governance team have a content roadmap through Q2?
  • Has this been shared with the DAO?

Progress treasury diversification conversations for the DAO

As evidenced by the interest in treasury management surfacing early in the first Co-Creation Cycle, this is a topic that is on the mind of many in the DAO. It is important that we progress on this front

Metrics:

  • Has the Foundation team met with at least 3 different treasury management service providers?
  • Is there a clear RFP for the DAO’s treasury management?
  • Has there been a meeting to review that RFP with the treasury management group?

Define an initial set of forum and documentation improvements

We are just getting started with governance at Scroll and we know there’s a lot that we can do better in terms of communication, ranging from our gov docs to our forum. In Q1, we want to outline an initial set of improvements and to start making those changes. There have been some small changes as we go, though we want to do a thorough review.

Metric: Has a forum post gone up outlining the forthcoming or active changes in regards to the gov docs and forum?

Ecosystem Growth goals

Prepare to publicly launch (open for applications) at least 2 grant programs (1 foundation program and 1 DAO program, targeting April 1)

We are keen to get the first funding programs from the DAO and the Foundation off the ground. While they are unlikely to launch in Q1, we do hope to see the first DAO grant program go up for vote by Mar 1 and to announce the first Foundation program on a similar timeline.

Metrics:

  • Has the first DAO grant program gone live to vote for approval?
  • Has the first Foundation grant program been announced?

Define clear desired outcomes and metrics of success for the first grant programs

As part of launching any new program, it is important to have a clear desired outcome, or a way that the world changes thanks to the introduction of this funding program (intervention). As such, we want to make it a norm that we have one clear desired outcome for each funding program and to have a suite of metrics for that program.

Metrics:

  • Does each new program have a clear desired outcome?
  • Does each program have a set of metrics that will be used to assess that program?
  • Has a data and metrics group been established in the DAO?
  • Has that group reviewed and provided feedback on the initial outcomes and metrics?

Establish a shared tooling and data architecture for the grant programs

While we envision a pluralistic grant future for Scroll, one where there will be multiple targeted programs for specific desired outcomes, we believe that having a shared data architecture across the programs is crucial to enable robust evaluation.

Metrics:

  • Has a grant application and review tool been put in place?
  • Has a tool for output tracking been put in place?
  • Has a data lake been set up to more easily share our data in Open Source Observer.
  • Is the program’s data conforming with DAOIP 5?

Global Community goals

Map the initial community partners in each of the 4 priority regions

In order to ensure that we are not duplicating efforts or unnecessarily fracturing local community efforts, it will be critical for the DAO to map out the existing communities organizing meetups, especially technical ones, in the cities that will be prioritized within the four regions.

Metrics:

  • Have local partners been mapped for Brazil
  • Have local partners been mapped for Kenya
  • Have local partners been mapped for Malaysia
  • Have local partners been mapped for South Korea
  • Has at least one conversation taken place with local partners for Brazil
  • Has at least one conversation taken place with local partners for Kenya
  • Has at least one conversation taken place with local partners for Malaysia
  • Has at least one conversation taken place with local partners for South Korea

Get initial local community node proposals focused on meetups live on the forum by Apr 1

As part of supporting and nurturing local communities nodes focused on Scroll (and more broadly on Ethereum) in our priority regions, we hope to see at least two proposals go live by Apr 1 to plug into existing meetups or to create new ones. These local nodes can have many elements to them and will likely look different across different cities and countries. We see the local nodes starting with a foundation of meetups and expanding from there.

Metric: Are at least two local node proposals focused on at least 6 months of meetups ready to go live on Apr 1?

Have a path to the next region to focus on beyond the initial four

While we are starting off with 4 priority regions, we are keen to expand beyond that in Q2. In order to make that possible, we should have some kind of structure in place for how we are going to choose the next region. This might naturally arise based on interest from the DAO, or we might produce a set of criteria to be met for the next region.

Metric: Has a fifth local node region been defined?

Governance Iterations goals

Have the Foundation outline some initial research projects to support in the form of an RFP (request for proposals) for a governance focused small grant program

As we develop a clearer series of research problems we want to explore, the Foundation wants to put together a series of RFPs for small (under $25k, preferably under $10k) grants relating to governance research and experimentation. These RFPs will touch on topics such as the use of AI for assisting governance onboarding and sensemaking, improving deliberation, experimenting with preference signaling, etc.

Metric: Is there at least one governance RFP live?

Plan and announce the next Co-Creation Cycle (2 in June)

After completing the first Co-Creation Cycle (CCC), we are inspired to shoot for 6 month governance seasons. These seasons will involve a 3-4 week CCC followed by roughly 5 months of executing the ideas that emerge from the CCC itself. As such, we want to provide some clarity on what folks can expect from CCC2 in June by the end of Q1.

Metric: Is there a forum post outlining the timing and high-level plan for CCC2 by the end of Q1?

Host a delegate day

Following the dinner we hosted in Bangkok, we want to try to host roughly 2-4 delegate events per year. Expanding on the dinner format, we want to host the first full delegate day where we can have a mix of socializing and workshops where we can both reflect on previous activities and plan future events.

Metric: Did we host a delegate day in Q1?

Propose the initial plan for how to increase the votable supply

As discussed in both the forum and via direct conversation with delegates, we are very aware of the various risks that having a low votable supply can lead to. While we have started a larger conversation on the forum, we want to make sure that a plan gets put forth by the end of the quarter.

Metrics:

  • Has a plan for improving votable supply been generated by the Foundation?
  • Has the plan been shared with the DAO?
  • Is there a clear timeline in place of when this will happen?

Share the initial Foundation outputs with the DAO via the forum

From the first days of the DAO, we have started working on a series of projects such as a handbook relating to the Co-Creation Cycle, a series of posts on some features (grant programs, accelerators, etc.) relating to growth and community, and a post and report from the DAOstar crew on delegate incentives.

Metrics:

  • Is there a series of 5 forum posts from Feems, all linked to within a single post?
  • Is there a post from Sam on the delegate incentives work?
  • Is there a post on the forum from Sarah on looking back on CCC1?
  • Is the CCC1 Handbook posted online?

Have a first proposal on the first iteration of a delegate training program

Creating pathways for new delegates to join, or for new governance contributors, can potentially assist with strengthening governance. As a result, there has been interest in creating a program to bring in new delegates to Scroll DAO. If there is not a clear path to deeper governance contribution as a result of the program, it is important to reframe such a program to be more focused on governance contribution more broadly.

Metric: Is there a proposal in either Mar 1 or Apr 1 for the first iteration of the delegate training program (or a governance contributor program)

9 Likes

Thank you Eugene for sharing the goals and priorities!

This plan is detailed and well-structured, which is a great sign for the future of the DAO’s governance. The transparency in setting specific goals with clear metrics is the way to go, although maybe would be focusing on trying to achieve short term goals first.

The iterative approach to governance and the emphasis on Co-Creation Cycles , I would like to see them as a proof that governance won’t be static—it will evolve based on actual participation and needs, and again from my perspective, that kind of adaptability is essential for long-term success.

Keep up the good work!

3 Likes

Thanks @eugene

It’s great to see the work over the last few months culminating into this.

I’m looking forward to seeing continued forward progress and will be anxious to see more details on the grant programs as they are formed.

3 Likes

This post serves as a reminder regarding the priorities, metrics, and expectations. Thank you for doing it @eugene

For clarification only:

Re Q1 Growth goals,

it says 1 DAO program & 1 Foundation program. Does that refer to:

Foundation’s program = DAO DeFi Grant Program,
DAO program = Regional Grants program, which needs to be scoped within each of the key regions.

If so, does it mean that the Foundation is expecting from the DAO to have at least 1 Regional grants program ready for vote by March 1?

Are the Local Nodes also included in the expectations of having a proposal ready for vote by March/April 1?

Re the Global Community section,

The Mexican Node looks like a natural country to continue with. We have a draft proposal for launching a community and we already have our channel in TG.
Here’s the link to the Mexican local node proposal, draft mode. It already holds some facts on why it should be considered.
The proposal is on draft and still requires discussion, but it might be one of the most advanced ones.

Re the Governance section,

Would be great to have a post regarding potential events that could host a Delegate Day. Personally, it would be a key factor for me to to choose which crypto events to attend.

Re the general post

Have you thought on having these priorities, milestones, tasks, and responsible people more structured and traceable? for example via ClickUp or DeWork? That way people we could even track who contributed to what things, when, dependencies, etc.

3 Likes

Hi @HumbertoBesso.

So any grant program getting designed with the DAO and requesting DAO approval would be considered a DAO program. As such, both the DeFi and Regional programs are currently planned to be DAO programs.

Foundation programs would be any other funding programs that we structure, such as a more open ended funding program or any others that might emerge.

I would love to see a local node proposal as soon as they’re ready. We’re working with the various regional groups to see when we can get the first ones ready for. I’m guessing that Apr 1 will be the first realistic voting cycle for a Local Node program

Thanks for drafting a proposal for it. Let’s schedule a time to discuss this. I’ll make sure to include Chris and Juan as well

As of now, the other event we are definitely planning a delegate day around is Devconnect. We have not finalized our conference plans between now and then so it’s a bit tough to commit to others at this point in time.

To be honest, I’ve thought about but haven’t looked into how to do it yet. Thanks for the nudge - we will look into how to improve the structure of this going forward

3 Likes