Proposal: Scroll DAO Delegate Accelerator Proposal

[Kene_StableLab]

@DonOfDAOs

Increase post-program delegation: I strongly believe follow-through is key. Should we want newly onboarded delegates to stay, they should feel as though they have graduated into becoming a durable, meaningful stakeholder in the ecosystem. With only 5,000 in delegated VP, I’m not sure this will be accomplished. Doubling the post program delegation to 10,000 SCR would be more suitable.

Thank you for the feedbakc, while we understand the rationale behind this, we think this may be too much delegation too soon, we would propose starting small with and wokring our way up based on how the delegate performs.

@DonOfDAOs

Eliminate The Program Incentives: The program offering itself is comprehensive and clearly designed with a great deal of care. The reward is being part of the cohort.

In order to increase the chances of retention and consistent engagement, we need to have incentives for trainees, this is a key feature of running a program in our ecosystem, comparable programs at Optimism leverage incentives to keep trainees engaged.

@DonOfDAOs

Budget: I have a lot of respect for @connormcmk 's candor here in speaking against his own potential compensation. I am not knowledgeable enough with regards to educational programs to be the right person to specifically suggestion budgets. However, I tend to agree with Connor’s logic and the general notion that the budget (unless further complexity and details are left out of the proposal as it stands) seem like they could be a bit more efficient – not a huge sticking point though.

Regarding costs, these are my thoughts.

@Kene_StableLab

The costs of running this program may seem high due to what it would take to set up a high-quality program. Still, suppose you also factor in the quality of instructors and curriculum developers working on this program. In that case, it becomes clear that building a scroll-focused delegate program may come at a premium.
These initial setup costs should not be viewed as the running costs of a delegate training program. With development out of the way, it will cost much less to run this program going forward if it is approved and possibly renewed.

@DonOfDAOs

KPIs: I also agree with @pedro in that the KPI structure is a bit loose. One remedy would be to remove KPIs but rather allow each cohort member to write a post-program personal report and appeal by which they share with the DAO what they’ve learned, what they’ve done, and what they will do. From this, the DAO can vote to ‘approve’ or ‘pass’ on that individual’s post-program delegation reward.

This is a very great suggestion and I will take note of this for possible consideration with the other authors.