Hey my friends,
A brief post on what it has been like to be a delegate with the Negation Game so far.
See the associated video and then I’ll provide a summary at the end as well.
Broad notices:
- Creating a Negation Game rationale definitely increased the breadth and depth of factors that I considered in making the decision
- Endorsing the various points, and reviewing my endorsements seemed to also increase my consistency, as things I had considered important in the past had the opportunity to be re-reviewed
- It doesn’t seem like the velocity of decision making really increased, in fact this was an additionally difficult vote for me which took me quite a while to come to a choice on
- It doesn’t seem like this helped in the negotiation process, it didn’t generate new alternatives based on the constraints that were noticed
So, in terms of our goal of increasing rigor and accountability, it at least had that effect on me. I’m curious about other delegate’s experiences. If you haven’t yet given feedback please fill out this survey:
And if you have any other questions or observations to share please feel free to reach me on telegram Telegram: Contact @connormcmk
Video version of this post