Request for Proposals: DAO Treasury Management

Hi!

Adding some comments to this conversation which we believe it’s more than timely. In that sense, we are supportive of having the election go into this voting cycle given based on some aspects:

1) The opportunity cost of having idle SCR on the treasury
2) The ongoing and upcoming disbursements in place which have been recently summarized and could definitely benefit from financial insights.

In that sense, we want to thank both providers for their presentations and ackowledge their trajectory in the ecosystem. Given the outline of the RFP and the current state of the DAO, we see some similarities in the approaches which naturally needs to be worked out collaboratively and iteratively due to the very nature of the activity.

Nonetheless, we do see AvantGarde having a more compelling pricing structure that better aligns with our compensation expectations.

For the kpk we don’t have clarity on the 0.5% mgmt fee and then the 20% performance top given that MYSO takes 15% as default protocol fee so would appreciate a further breakdown on that flow. Also it seems that the minimum fee is significantly higher.

We’ll wait to see the discussion unfold but as verified delegates we believe this proposal is ready for a vote.

3 Likes