Proposal: Scroll DAO Delegate Accelerator Proposal

Governance Iterations
39

We voted ABSTAIN on this proposal. While we fully support delegate‑onboarding and education initiatives, the program as presented is too broad and insufficiently focused. Our primary concern is the absence of clear, data‑driven KPIs to back the program’s stated objectives— namely:

  • Increase active votable supply

  • Improve proposal quality

  • Strengthen community resilience

For example, the following KPIs could be measured:

  1. Increase in percent of delegated supply vs. total votable supply

  2. Proposal revision rate after delegate feedback on forum (or in Negation game)

  3. Number of new delegates who actively use Negation game

Without concrete, measurable targets, it is hard to assess progress or hold the program accountable.

We applaud Scroll’s willingness to experiment with governance tooling—VOICE and, separately, the Negation Game are encouraging—but the proposal still needs sharper goals, defined success metrics, and a tighter scope before we can endorse it.

1 Like