Sorry for the delay!
Selection process - they’re being selected by the Scroll team initially. I don’t believe the future process has been outlined. That is something that can be addressed initially or as the first amendment to make. I will speak with the team about it this week.
This feels as though it should be a separate convo. Feel free to provide more info in a separate post, which can start a general conversation around governance security.
Happy to have this discussion, though personally, I think it’s a bit premature. I think there is still so much left to do in the coming months on the core operations and activities of the DAO. As a result, it’d be great to focus limited attention to these initial aspects instead of taking on too many things from the start (especially given the current setup risks being inefficient (less urgent) vs insecure (more urgent). Please do feel free to bring up the conversation when it feels appropriate.
Sorry, can you elaborate on your question
This is one of the places I need to make sure to link to the gov docs. The manager is managed by the Foundation and is a 2/3 managed by the gov team and someone on the ops side.
What is the power / control it has that is worth decentralizing? I see the main thing as who has the power to post proposals. That can be adjusted without decentralizing the control of the manager contract to start, which feels like the priority. I will have to double check the other things the Manager wallet controls and then can add more thoughts.
Agreed! I want to make sure we have a discussion on it (and thanks to all who have contributed to the post so far) and prioritize this in the next few months. If you don’t mind copying your suggestions over to that post, that’d be great!