Proposal: Proposal: Ecosystem Growth Council Formation
Vote: For
Rationale: We’re supporting this proposal because it introduces the Ecosystem Growth Council to guide Scroll’s ecosystem expansion at a time when coordinated growth is essential. We believe the Ecosystem Growth Council (EGC) has clear KPIs and will establish a strong foundation for driving meaningful and measurable impact. By bringing clarity to how initiatives are proposed, evaluated, and resourced, the Council strengthens the ability to fund what matters most, high-impact projects that deliver tangible value to the ecosystem. This proposal represents a strong first step toward more strategic and effective governance and we believe it will meaningfully enhance Scroll’s capacity to support ecosystem builders.
Proposal: Proposal: Gov Contribution Recognition - Retro & Working Group
Vote: For
Rationale: We’re supportive of this proposal because recognizing and rewarding governance contributions is a critical step toward sustaining long-term engagement across the ecosystem. As we continue to evolve our governance structures, it’s important that delegates feel seen and valued for their efforts. The creation of a working group dedicated to refining the next iteration of GCR is not only timely but also essential to ensuring the metric is both fair and reflective of the actual impact individuals and teams have on Scroll governance. We believe that a thoughtful, collaborative approach to defining these metrics will lead to a more robust and inclusive governance framework.
Proposal: Proposal Title: Votable Supply Adjustment - Auto-Abstaining Wallet
Vote: For
Rationale: We’re supportive of this proposal, as we mentioned on the forum. While it may not fully capture the current delegate sentiment, the Auto-Abstaining Wallet offers a thoughtful and pragmatic approach to an ongoing governance challenge in Scroll, where proposals sometimes struggle to reach quorum due to the concentration of significant voting power held by a few delegates who may be temporarily inactive. By delegating 500K SCR to a wallet that auto-abstains, this mechanism effectively lowers the active votable supply, enabling the DAO to continue functioning smoothly. We believe this short-term solution supports governance continuity and stability. During this duration, it allows the DAO to assess its effectiveness with quorum issues and develop more comprehensive solutions, which are essential for the healthy evolution of the Scroll ecosystem.
Proposal: Proposal: Brazil Local Node
Vote: For
Rationale: We’re voting “For” this proposal because Brazil already has high crypto adoption, with strong transaction volume and a growing user base. This presents a valuable opportunity to attract builders to Scroll. We support the modular crypto approach and trust the team’s proven track record and well-structured execution plan. The initiative combines online classes through “Programa de Aceleração Scroll Brasil”, in-person events across three cities, and robust educational content, all backed by clear KPIs. We’re excited to support the formation of the Brazil Local Node and look forward to its impact on the Scroll ecosystem.
Proposal: Kenya Scroll Local Node Founder Program
Vote: For
Rationale: We support this proposal as it contains a thoroughly developed plan to target specific types of projects to incubate onchain infrastructure in Africa. We like the fact that the proposal aims to build 5–10 MVPs within three months, bridging Web3 and traditional finance through a clear development pipeline with measurable KPIs. We look forward to seeing this Kenya initiative drive meaningful progress in a key region the foundation has set for local node deployment.
Proposal: Mexico Mobile Scroll Node: A Founder-Focused Onboarding and Support Program
Vote: For
Rationale: We’re voting “For” this proposal because it introduces a creative and localized approach to growing the Scroll ecosystem in Mexico. By using a mobile node to directly engage founders, the initiative brings mentorship, education, and grant preparation to communities with strong potential to join the open economy. However, we believe it would be better to have a more concise execution plan finalized before the 3 months period begins. (e.g. detailed curriculum etc.) This would allow for more effective ongoing adjustments during the execution phase, considering 2 months period seems too short to make impactful adjustments and optimize the program’s impact.