Strategic Deliberation for SP-1 Vote

General
1

Hello fellow Scrollers,

This afternoon I put together a rationale for my planned vote on SP-1, Proposal: Research to inform a builder support strategy - #15 by EthereumTGU

https://play.negationgame.com/s/scroll/DTPqAc
https://play.negationgame.com/s/scroll/DTPqAc1920×1214 157 KB

I’m planning to vote in favor of SP-1. You can see my full rationale here:
Scroll DAO should pass Proposal: Research to inform a builder support strategy

Key points in favor include:

  1. The cost of poorly executing on a builder support program could be enormously expensive
  2. I’m really impressed by the RnDAO team, especially including Daniel Stringer
  3. The live Q&As and community conversations seem like a credible method of disseminating information to the community
  4. RnDAO has an incentive to do a good job finding accurate information for Scroll DAO

Key points against:

  1. The 2-3 month timeline to get results seems excessively long for 40 interviews.
  2. I’m unsure whether it would be possible to find another firm who could do equal or better research for a similar or superior cost

If you disagree with my conclusion, either because I underweight a particular risk or because I have missed something, please feel free to leave comments here or in the negation game itself.

I precommit to voting NO on SP-1 if this point falls below 10 favor (unless there’s credible evidence of manipulation of the votes).

Note that the negation game is an experimental product and we’re still working out the kinks.

5 Likes