Hi there!
Catching up to this discussion! So first of all we do wanna stress that coordination and cohesion are definitely some of the key aspects that make up for succesfull DAO. In decentralized enviroments, as we all know, this is particularly challenging so we celebrate this being discussed.
In that sense, we do consider that we are upon the first iterations of Scroll Governance which are now reflecting in the Councils being voted. The effectiveness of those Councils is yet to be proben so we’d be careful in adding additional structures or layers that although might sound promising they can traduce in overhead and operations being swamped.
We think that the Council structure sustains in the possibility of actually making decisions and allocate funds based on their scope and design. It’s still way too early to determine the impact of their activity but they are entrusted to execute on the DAOs best interest and that is what we think should be prioritized at this point.
On this basis, the coordination between councils is practically built into the EOC design since it should actively engage with them and their projects in order for the EOC to meet it’s purpouse. This of course should be both to accomplish the oversight activity but also to prospectively enhance DAO operations and bring cohesion to all the moving pieces.
Moreso, we think that the Key Duties set for the Support Squad fall right into the Council members scope already. Seeing EGC actively engaging in the forum, calls and carefully documenting their steps is a good example of how Councils should operate and communicate. It is true that it can become burdensome, but that discussion should fall into the number of Council seats and if they can be shared rather than having a separate dedicated team.