At Ethereum Argentina, we vote abstain on this proposal.
According to the calculations, the proposal would benefit us directly and a payment in our favor would be executed, which clearly creates a conflict of interest on our end.
We appreciate the Foundation’s intention to compensate delegates for their work. That said, we encourage the DAO to rethink the model and criteria used to determine payments, as these will strongly shape the behaviors that emerge within the DAO.
In particular, we believe it’s important to prioritize contributions that deliver concrete and measurable value. Which, in our view, translates to successfully executed proposals.
The principle that governance requires real effort and dedication is fundamental to the long-term health of the DAO, and it’s great to see Scroll formalizing a way to recognize this. This will undoubtedly encourage more high-quality participation
hey all! it’s exciting to see compensation methodologies to emerge around the space! And very curious to see how the present compensation policies actually moves forward.
From all the amazing inputs I’ve read here, I’d like to remark:
incentives drive people’s behaviours, and behaviours drive culture.
At Collabberry (an RnDAO venture) we’ve expend months of research to understand what are the mechanisms to keep engagement together while anabling fairness in the work recognition process.
After reading the proposals and the reflections, I’ve individuated the need in this governance community to do a proper benchmark on compensation mechanisms, therefore I’ve upload this post: P2P Compensation System for Gov Retribution Compensation working group on the forum for you guys to have a look.
TL;DR; Most DAOs today struggle with fair, clear, and sustainable contributor compensation — often relying on volatile tokens, unclear value attribution, and weak reputation systems. CollabBerry is a peer-to-peer accounting and compensation protocol designed to fix this, offering transparent agreements, assessments, and dynamic reward distribution.
Aligned with Scroll’s direction toward retroactive and contextual contribution recognition, CollabBerry brings:
We’re proposing to explore synergies with Scroll by introducing CollabBerry into its ecosystem — empowering more equitable and aligned contributor experiences. In other words, we are looking forward in collaborate with the Scroll DAO community on this:
We voted for the Governance Contribution Recognition (Retro) Working Group is significantly strengthens Scroll DAO’s ability to recognize and reward delegate contributions over time. This initiative helps build a fairer and more inclusive governance model by introducing structured retroactive acknowledgment, rather than focusing solely on future efforts. It aligns well with our commitment to transparency and continuous improvement, providing a meaningful way to honor past work and motivate future participation.
Sorry for the tremendous delay in processing the second batch of payments here. Should be signed/executed tomorrow or Monday at the latest.
I am having trouble getting in touch with some folks / hearing back from some folks. If you’re one of them or you know them, please nudge them.
We are extending this deadline until Sept 15th - this is a bit over 2 months from the first payout date. Any delegates who have not completed KYC/KYB and confirmed their wallet payout by then will be forfeiting their payment, and unused funds will be returned to the DAO.