I am voting FOR, for this proposal.
I do think audits are a good incentive to attract long-term builders and also a way to make sure funds are safe with projects building on Scroll. This tackles a real bottleneck as most teams treat an audit like a finish line, but the risk actually spikes after launch.
I also like that subsidies are structured as investments, not one-off grants. If a team scales, the DAO captures a sliver of upside, which is a good aligned incentive. The rating rubric + eligibility checks reduce subsidy farming, and the Foundation/EGC/Labs oversight gives operational clarity. That is a good structure for it.