Thank you everyone for your responses and feedback!
Also, a special thanks to those who flagged missed data - much appreciated. The spreadsheet has now been updated accordingly.
As a follow-up to the call we had on Wednesday, and as we continue to receive input on how to proceed, here’s a quick update and a few action points:
Action Points:
-
Final review: This is the last call to review your data. If you spot any inconsistencies, please let us know as soon as possible.
-
Proposal to include:
We’ve also received suggestion to add Matt Haynes and Nick Almond (@drnick, Factory Labs) to the contribution list. Even though they didn’t hit the voting threshold, they’ve shown up regularly to calls, have contributed meaningfully and helped to shape proposals such as Delegate training proposal. Since this process is really about recognizing meaningful contributions, we think it makes sense to include them as an exception. Let us know what you think! -
Formula decision:
We need to decide whether to proceed with the original formula or the updated version. Please indicate your preference and endorsement. -
Next steps:
We’d like to make the process of tracking and recognizing governance contributions smoother and easier to follow in the future.
As mentioned earlier, we’re thinking of setting up a working group (for about 4–5 weeks) to put together a proposal for the next iteration of the GCR. We’ll share more details soon on how we plan to kick off that process.
Looking forward to your thoughts!