This thread will be used to communicate the rationales provided by the community of Event Horizon voters. Unless otherwise stated, this is not a reflection of the team’s perspectives but rather a relay of community consensus.
Introduction
Event Horizon is the largest metagovernance and agentic governance protocol. Event Horizon has mobilized >$500,000,000 of voting power across ~700 proposals on 9 DAOs all on behalf of retail voters at no cost to the user. This is $500,000,000 of voice amplification for the low-capital, high-conviction citizens which would never have been possible prior to the Event Horizon’s product.
SCROLL DAO – “EUCLID UPGRADE” VOTE SUMMARY
1. Overall Results
-
Total ballots: 161
-
FOR: 160 (99.4 %)
-
AGAINST: 1 (0.6 %)
-
ABSTAIN: 0
2. Core Themes in the “FOR” Rationales
(approximate share of 160 FOR votes mentioning the theme)
| Theme |
Typical wording in rationales |
Share |
| Lower fees & higher throughput |
“reduced fees”, “increased TPS”, “better performance” |
~ 90 % |
| Stronger security |
audits by Cantina / Trail of Bits, Security Council oversight, “MPT state commitment” |
~ 80 % |
| OpenVM Prover migration |
cited as key to speed & EVM‑compatibility |
~ 70 % |
| Thorough audits & staged governance rollout |
“structured governance”, “successful testnet phases” |
~ 65 % |
| Better developer / dApp compatibility |
EIP‑7702, RIP‑7212, “smart account standards” |
~ 50 % |
| Token‑value & revenue growth |
staking, liquidity, passive income, DeFi/GameFi adoption |
~ 45 % |
5. Key Take‑Aways
-
Near‑unanimous support – with 99 % FOR, the community views Euclid as vital to Scroll’s roadmap.
-
Performance, cost, and security are the dominant selling points; voters tie them directly to greater adoption and token demand.
-
Process confidence – repeated references to multi‑firm audits, testnets, and Security‑Council gating quelled most risk concerns.
SCROLL DAO CONSTITUTION – VOTE & RATIONALE DIGEST
1. Overall Results
[post-agentic, full context rationales]
-
Total ballots: 130
-
FOR: 127 (97.7 %)
-
AGAINST: 2 (1.5 %)
-
ABSTAIN: 1 (0.8 %)
2. Core Themes in “FOR” Rationales
(percentages refer to how many of the 127 FOR rationales mention the theme)
-
Clear, transparent governance & accountability – 89 %
-
Progressive decentralization / living‑document flexibility – 77 %
-
Inclusive / global participation – 62 %
-
Security Council & technical safeguards – 41 %
-
Alignment with long‑term token value & sustainable revenue – 39 %
-
Risk management & ecosystem resilience – 34 %
3. Reasons Cited by “AGAINST” Voters
- 0x9E7C…5f98
-
Excessive control retained by the Foundation
-
Low quorum may enable governance capture
-
Wants explicit decentralization milestones before supporting
- 0xCA5F…6BAa
6. Take‑Away
The revised Scroll DAO Constitution enjoys near‑unanimous backing (97.7 % FOR). Supporters converge on transparency, accountability, progressive decentralization, and inclusive participation as cornerstones for scaling Scroll’s Layer‑2 ecosystem and token economy. Dissent focuses on decentralization speed, and structural flexibility—clear touch‑points for future refinement.
Research to inform a builder support strategy
59 voters participated [pre-agentic / form-type rationale]
– 55 FOR
– 1 AGAINST
– 3 ABSTAIN
6 voters left rationales:
– 5 corresponded to a FOR vote, each referencing a desire to support builders and felt that this protocol was a good first step. One voter noted that research will prevent future wasteful spending.
– 1 corresponded to an AGAINST vote: this voter stated “I think the requested budget is too high, but the work is needed, I would vote For if the requested budget decreases by 30%”.