I think this is the right positioning that this council should have. A clear inclusive process + a “final proposal” decision power.
Hi, @coffee-crusher !
Yes, having 2 paid council members would increase the costs.
So, instead of one person = * 10k SCR per month * 6 months = 60k SCR [this assumes an SCR price of $0.3 - to be revised once approved to reflect market rates], this amount would double to 120k SCR (to be revised based on the market price).
120,000 out of 1,500.000 still leaves a good portion of the budget to be used for purposes listed in the proposal, so in my view the budget as in size doesn’t require correction, but the description is, will update and share soon in the final version of the proposal.
Thank you so much for clarifying that. I figured that had to do with the budget allocations, but wanted to ensure that the increased amount didn’t draw away from the impact of the actual activities - grants, the tooling to accomplish the goals, etc.
I look forward to endorsing the final proposal version for a vote recommendation. Thank you for your response!
It’s been great seeing this proposal evolve, and the push for a delegate-majority council strengthens the original vision. Beyond the structure, the core idea here has always been about creating a dedicated R&D wing for governance itself.
You can count on our full support for this proposal once it’s formally up for a vote.