We see this proposal as a fundamental step towards strengthening both the resilience and innovative capacity of the Scroll DAO’s governance model. The establishment of a dedicated council tasked with developing a research and experimentation roadmap, including RFPs on critical areas such as the use of AI in governance, deliberative tools, and structured decentralization pathways, is not only timely but also highly strategic and visionary. By creating a space where governance can be systematically tested, challenged, and iterated, the proposal lays the groundwork for Scroll to lead by example in the broader Web3 ecosystem.
The proposed distribution of seats, two representatives from the Foundation and one delegate or governance professional, reflects an acknowledgment of the DAO’s current maturity stage. However, to build long-term legitimacy, we recommend the incorporation of formal decentralization milestones within the six-month timeline. These milestones would act as tangible signals of commitment to gradually transition from foundation-led structures to community-driven decision-making.
Equally important is the inclusion of explicit and well-defined criteria for conflict of interest assessment in the council’s design. Such safeguards are essential not only to ensure fairness and impartiality but also to strengthen community trust, transparency, and the perceived legitimacy of council decisions. Clear disclosure frameworks, recusal processes, and accountability mechanisms would help establish a culture of integrity that is vital for the DAO’s sustainability.