Hi everyone!
Jumping in to clarify a bit some of the questions regarding the SEED Local Node proposal and this one. Our proposal stood as a first try to propel the local node initiative in Argentina in sight of its relevance for the industry and the opportunity that DevConnect represents for Scroll. In that sense, we’re happy to see different organizations adding up to the case, a true showcase of Argentina’s vibrancy. We are and always have been open to collaborate, exchange ideas and iteratively refine the proposal into Scrolls interest and Argentina’s reality.
We are in contact with the @ChatterPay and @Buidlers teams in order to explore synergies and unify strengths into the local node, something that might not be formalized in this current proposal but will do so in a potential future one if there’s intention to renew the program.
At this point we expect this proposal to follow its course within the governance process and contribute to it in order to see the Argentina Local Node live. We are naturally aligned with the spirit of the proposal in its builder-centric and vertical-focused approach, as well as the remote semi-format that will likely enhance participation.
As a comment, we do expect that some of the derived initiatives such as the one presented by @FinGuru do fall under the local node scope and some prior alignment is made before reaching the forum in order to keep things structured. Being that said, we’ll be following the unfolding of the discussion and keep working towards the final version of the proposal before the voting cycle.
Thanks!