Thanks to @Danielo and team for putting together this proposal. We see the value in approaching ecosystem growth from a bottom-up approach, with research being the foundation.
Especially for us whose core focus is capital allocation in DAOs, we share a similar view that providing builder support is much more than grant programs. There are other effective and unique ways of allocating capital towards supporting ecosystem growth, and we would like to see this at play in Scroll DAO. We think this proposal is, in general, a step in the right direction and would like to highlight some points:
- We appreciate the inclusion of a retrospective as part of the deliverables. We just want to clarify - at what stage will this be conducted? To us, a retrospective seems to be most valuable over a longer period when recommendations from the research have been tested and implemented by the DAO. Does this align with your thinking? And if done this way, will it impact the proposed budget given that this may extend reasonably well into the future?
Once again, thanks for putting this together.