# Proposal: Research to inform a builder support strategy

**URL:** <https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-research-to-inform-a-builder-support-strategy/368>\
**Category:** Governance Iterations\
**Tags:** research, proposal\
**Created:** [December 26, 2024, 6:19pm UTC](https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-research-to-inform-a-builder-support-strategy/368 "2024-12-26T18:19:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![danielo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forum.scroll.io/danielo/32/145_2.png) [@danielo](https://forum.scroll.io/u/danielo)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2025, 7:55pm UTC](https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-research-to-inform-a-builder-support-strategy/368/27 "2025-01-08T19:55:15Z")

</div>

Thanks for the thorough rationale! Answering one of the comments below

> [@Strategic Deliberation for SP-1 Vote](https://forum.scroll.io/t/strategic-deliberation-for-sp-1-vote/401/1):
>
> The 2-3 month timeline to get results seems excessively long for 40 interviews.

I tried using the negation game but couldn’t submit a negation (ended up in a loop of statement suggestions). Anyhow, the comment is that the 2-3 months is to share research conclusions, while preliminary insights can be shared sooner. Also it’s not 2-3 months for 40 interviews. It’s 2-3 months for:

- review of previous research and 10 interviews with program managers
- review of work done by the foundation
- 40 interviews with builders

So basically it’s a more comprehensive research initiative out of which the builder interviews is only one component

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-research-to-inform-a-builder-support-strategy/368)._