# Proposal: Research to inform a builder support strategy

**URL:** <https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-research-to-inform-a-builder-support-strategy/368>\
**Category:** Governance Iterations\
**Tags:** research, proposal\
**Created:** [December 26, 2024, 6:19pm UTC](https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-research-to-inform-a-builder-support-strategy/368 "2024-12-26T18:19:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 24

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![connormcmk](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forum.scroll.io/connormcmk/32/58_2.png) [@connormcmk](https://forum.scroll.io/u/connormcmk)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2025, 6:19pm UTC](https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-research-to-inform-a-builder-support-strategy/368/24 "2025-01-08T18:19:31Z")

</div>

Hi all,

I recently published my intended vote and wrote up my voting rationale for this proposal which you can find here:

> [@Strategic Deliberation for SP-1 Vote](https://forum.scroll.io/t/strategic-deliberation-for-sp-1-vote/401):
>
> Hello fellow Scrollers, This afternoon I put together a rationale for my planned vote on SP-1, [Proposal: Research to inform a builder support strategy - #15 by EthereumTGU](https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-research-to-inform-a-builder-support-strategy/368/15) I’m planning to vote in favor of SP-1. You can see my full rationale here: [Scroll DAO should pass Proposal: Research to inform a builder support strategy](https://play.negationgame.com/s/scroll/DTPqAc) Key points in favor include: [The cost of poorly executing on a builder support program could be enormously expensive](https://play.negationgame.com/s/scroll/uWzDav)[I…](https://play.negationgame.com/s/scroll/uWXDav)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-research-to-inform-a-builder-support-strategy/368)._