# LifeofDan-EL Delegate Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegates\ **Tags:** delegates\ **Created:** [October 31, 2024, 8:45pm UTC](https://forum.scroll.io/t/lifeofdan-el-delegate-thread/186 "2024-10-31T20:45:56Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 12
**Author:** ![LifeofDan-EL](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forum.scroll.io/lifeofdan-el/32/80_2.png) [@LifeofDan-EL](https://forum.scroll.io/u/LifeofDan-EL)\ **Post date:** [August 9, 2025, 10:56am UTC](https://forum.scroll.io/t/lifeofdan-el-delegate-thread/186/12 "2025-08-09T10:56:18Z")
> [@Proposal: Security Subsidy Program for Scroll Builders](https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-security-subsidy-program-for-scroll-builders/872/31): > > As agreed on the last Weekly DAO & Governance Call, we’re providing a minor update to this proposal to clarify a term that was used in a confusing way. In this final version of the proposal, we’ve then removed all references to a formal investment committee, clarifying that such role will be led by the Scroll Foundation for the time being, with input from relevant teams and committees when appropriate. Proposal Title: Security Subsidy Program for Scroll Builders Proposal Type: Growth Summary: T… I am voting **FOR** , for this proposal. I do think audits are a good incentive to attract long-term builders and also a way to make sure funds are safe with projects building on Scroll. This tackles a real bottleneck as most teams treat an audit like a finish line, but the risk actually spikes after launch. I also like that subsidies are structured as investments, not one-off grants. If a team scales, the DAO captures a sliver of upside, which is a good aligned incentive. The rating rubric + eligibility checks reduce subsidy farming, and the Foundation/EGC/Labs oversight gives operational clarity. That is a good structure for it. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.scroll.io/t/lifeofdan-el-delegate-thread/186)._